Report Code : CVMI060520252 | Published Date : May 6, 2025

The aquaculture diagnostics market is projected to grow from 580 million in 2024 to 2.8 billion by 2031 (CAGR: 30.2%), driven by intensifying disease pressures and stricter food safety regulations. This sector encompasses pathogen detection, water quality monitoring, and health assessment technologies that are becoming essential tools for modern aquaculture operations. The market segmentation reveals:

Key Technology Categories:

  • Molecular Diagnostics (XX% share): PCR, qPCR, and LAMP-based systems
  • Immunoassays (XX%): ELISA and lateral flow devices
  • Microbiological (XX%): Culture-based identification
  • Next-Gen (10%): eDNA metabarcoding and AI-powered imaging

Species-Specific Adoption:

  • Shrimp (45% demand): EMS and WSSV testing dominate
  • Salmonids (XX%): ISA, PD, and SRS detection
  • Tilapia/Carp (XX%): Emerging streptococcosis diagnostics
  • Shellfish (XX%): Vibrio and norovirus monitoring

Regional Leaders:

  • Asia-Pacific (XX% market): Vietnam and India's shrimp industry drives growth
  • Europe (XX%): Norway's strict salmon health protocols
  • Americas (20%): Chile's SRS monitoring programs
  • Middle East/Africa (5%): Emerging hatchery diagnostics

2. Key Growth Drivers

Disease Economic Impacts

  • Shrimp pathogens cause $6B+ annual losses (WSSV, EMS, EHP)
  • Salmonid diseases result in 20-30% mortality rates (ISA, BKD)
  • Emerging viruses show 70% cross-species infection potential

Regulatory Pressures

  • EU Regulation 2017/625 mandates pathogen testing for imports
  • US FDA Seafood HACCP requires Vibrio monitoring
  • China's 2025 Food Safety Law increases inspection frequency

Technological Advancements

  • Portable qPCR devices deliver lab-quality results in 45 minutes
  • Multiplex panels detect 12+ pathogens simultaneously
  • Blockchain-enabled tests create immutable health records
  • AI-based histopathology achieves 95% diagnostic accuracy

Production Intensification

  • RAS systems require continuous water quality diagnostics
  • High-density farming increases disease transmission risks
  • Global trade necessitates certified pathogen-free stock

3. Technology Comparison

Technology

Throughput

Cost/Test

Key Advantage

Conventional PCR

40 samples/run

USD 18

Established protocols

Real-time qPCR

96 samples/run

USD 25

Quantitative results

LAMP

1-12 samples

USD 8

No thermocycler needed

ELISA

96 samples/run

USD 6

High specificity

Lateral Flow

1 sample

USD 3

Field-deployable

eDNA Metabarcoding

384 samples

USD 50

Ecosystem-level monitoring

4. Regional Adoption Patterns

Asia-Pacific's Diagnostic Boom:

  • Vietnam's shrimp farms perform 12M+ WSSV tests annually
  • India's new guidelines require EMS testing every 2 weeks
  • China's mega-farms invest in automated monitoring systems

Europe's Quality Focus:

  • Norway's Fish Health Report mandates 58 pathogen tests
  • UK's Shellfish Waters Directive increases Vibrio surveillance
  • EU's new PCR standards for seafood exports

Americas' Emerging Needs:

  • Chile's SRS Program tests 100% of smolts
  • US Gulf oyster farms adopt norovirus rapid tests
  • Brazil's tilapia industry implements streptococcosis panels

5. Implementation Challenges

Technical Limitations:

  • RNA degradation in field samples reduces accuracy
  • Cross-reactivity in antibody-based tests
  • Limited validation for emerging pathogens

Economic Barriers:

  • $50K+ equipment costs for molecular systems
  • $2-5 test pricing prohibitive for smallholders
  • Training requirements for advanced technologies

Logistical Issues:

  • Cold chain failures affect 15% of samples
  • Turnaround delays in remote areas
  • Data integration challenges across systems





Reasons To Buy

Image



Scope

Image
  • IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
  • Zoetis Inc.
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Neogen Corporation
  • bioMérieux SA
  • Eurofins Scientific SE
Image